This particular bush caught my eye as I passed by it…each of the leaves changed color depending on which angle one viewed it from — amazing.

This particular bush caught my eye as I passed by it…each of the leaves changed color depending on which angle one viewed it from — amazing.


Ok, maybe two if we count the railroad track…
Just one of the many beautiful trails in the Hudson Valley…

Even with an ominous gray cloud sneaking in, the spring sky was beautiful that day.


I tried the Potter’s wheel again and it’s just so difficult. I ended up with another inadvertent candle holder and the smaller vessel you see was my consolation prize using the bottom to a bowl whose sides flew off…never give up as they say.

Found this little guy hanging out yesterday…
Frog or Toad?

I did a quick sketch the Mona Lisa, such fun! The position of the pupils is such a big part of the expression.

While on a kayak trip recently I saw the following evidence of strategic chewing…

Hard to believe beavers have this level of intention in designing and building structures from wood. I recall an economics professor of mine at New York University who was a graduate of MIT. His school ring had an image of a beaver, the animal considered to be the “Engineer of the natural word”.l word” .

He also relayed a funny anecdote, which is that students wear the ring with the beaver facing them and then turn it around after graduation — the explanation? That during the hard work of earning a degree there, the beaver “shits on you”, and once you have graduated, the beaver “shits on the world”, or something like that.

What a fascinating development in a famous painting: Smithsonian magazine had a great article today featuring a mid-restoration Vermeer painting called Girl Reading a Letter at an Open Window. This is the painting prior to restoration:

It turns out that an artist other than Vermeer painted over a Cupid in the upper right corner of the painting — previously it was thought that Vermeer himself had covered it up.
Now, ongoing restoration work has added yet another wrinkle to the story of the 1657 masterpiece: As Germany’s Staatliche Kunstsammlungen Dresden announced earlier this week, a recent bout of laboratory testing confirmed that a long-hidden Cupid found in the top right-hand corner of the canvas was painted over not by the Dutch Golden Age artist, but an unknown party who acted decades after Vermeer’s death. Although art historians have known of the little god of love’s existence since 1979, they previously believed Vermeer covered up the figure himself and, as a result, decided against restoring the painting to its original form. [Link]
This change in understanding led to a decision to reveal the Cupid, and the restored painting invites us all to reassess the composition of the painting (I’m an amateur, but it’s still fun).
Here is the painting about half-way through its current restoration:

It is fascinating to see the obvious geometry inherent in the composition as Vermeer’s original work is revealed, and indeed it makes more sense (not that anyone would have criticized the composition before? I’ll have to look into it).
I added the following lines to see how things line up:

Clearly the two faces are connected in such a way that their intersection points towards the open window, and in the screen shot showing more of the light, one can see how balanced it will be after the Cupid is fully revealed:
